Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

Conscience Rights or Conscience Wrongs?: Debating conscientious objection in healthcare

Series
Uehiro Oxford Institute
Audio Embed
Alberto Giubilini and David Jones trade views and argue each other's position on conscientious objection in healthcare
In this unusual online debate, Alberto Guibilini (Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics) and David Jones (The Anscombe Bioethics Centre) adopt each other's position on conscientious objection, arguing for the opposing view in an attempt to explore not only the subject, but the very nature of disagreement and discussion.

More in this series

View Series
Uehiro Oxford Institute

Choosing Now for Later: Precedent Autonomy and Problem of Surrogate Decision-Making After Severe Brain Injury

Recording of the New St Cross Special Ethics Seminar on surrogate decision-making after severe brain injury.
Previous
Uehiro Oxford Institute

Affect, Value and Problems Assessing Decision-Making Capacity

MT20 New St Cross Special Ethics Seminar with Assoc. Professor Jennifer Hawkins
Next
Transcript Available

Episode Information

Series
Uehiro Oxford Institute
People
Alberto Giubilini
David Jones
Keywords
bioethics
medical ethics
Conscientious Objection
healthcare
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 14/10/2020
Duration: 01:28:37

Subscribe

Apple Podcast Video Apple Podcast Audio Audio RSS Feed

Download

Download Audio Download Transcript

Footer

  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Contribute
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • Privacy
'Oxford Podcasts' Twitter Account @oxfordpodcasts | MediaPub Publishing Portal for Oxford Podcast Contributors | Upcoming Talks in Oxford | © 2011-2022 The University of Oxford