Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

Waiver or understanding? A dilemma for autonomists about informed consent

Series
Uehiro Oxford Institute
Audio Embed
Professor Gopal Sreenivasan delivers a New St Cross Special Ethics Seminar on the topic of Informed Consent.
This talk develops a novel argument to show that prospective research subjects can validly consent to participate in a study without understanding (most of) the content of the required disclosure. Its point of departure is the right subjects standardly have to waive (most of) the investigator’s duty to disclose. Things get worse for autonomy based defences of informed consent because this right to waive is very well grounded in an individual’s autonomy.

More in this series

View Series
Uehiro Oxford Institute

Fighting diseases of poverty through research: Deadly dilemmas, moral distress and misplaced responsibilities

A New St Cross Special Ethics Seminar, with Professor Maureen Kelley.
Previous
Uehiro Oxford Institute

Do We Need Mental Privacy? The Ethics of Mind Reading Reloaded

Marcello Ienca discusses moral and legal issues surrounding the decoding – ‘mind reading’ - of brain activity
Next
Transcript Available

Episode Information

Series
Uehiro Oxford Institute
People
Gopal Sreenivasan
Keywords
informed consent
Research Ethics
autonomy
Department: Uehiro Oxford Institute
Date Added: 08/06/2021
Duration: 00:44:14

Subscribe

Apple Podcast Video Apple Podcast Audio Audio RSS Feed

Download

Download Audio Download Transcript

Footer

  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Contribute
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • Privacy
'Oxford Podcasts' Twitter Account @oxfordpodcasts | MediaPub Publishing Portal for Oxford Podcast Contributors | Upcoming Talks in Oxford | © 2011-2022 The University of Oxford